8873462

Reduced Complexity Receiver For UL CoMP

PublishedOctober 28, 2014
Assigneenot available in USPTO data we have
Technical Abstract

Patent Claims
20 claims

Legal claims defining the scope of protection. Each claim is shown in both the original legal language and a plain English translation.

Claim 1

Original Legal Text

1. A method comprising: receiving signals from a plurality of antennas, the signals being from a plurality of user equipments and comprising a plurality of sub-bands allocated to the plurality of user equipments; selecting, based on one or more criteria and for each of the plurality of selected sub-bands allocated to a selected one of the plurality of user equipments, one or more antennas of the plurality of antennas to be used for signal detection and interference suppression on the received signals for the selected user equipment; and performing, for the selected user equipment, the signal detection and interference suppression on the received signals for each of the plurality of selected sub-bands based on the corresponding selected one or more antennas for each of the plurality of selected sub-bands to create an output signal by subtracting an interference signal from the received signals.

Plain English Translation

A method for improving signal reception in cellular networks, especially in Coordinated Multi-Point (CoMP) scenarios, involves receiving signals from multiple antennas, where these signals originate from multiple user devices and are divided into sub-bands allocated to each user. For each user and each of its allocated sub-bands, the method selects a subset of the available antennas based on certain criteria. It then performs signal detection and interference suppression on the received signals for that user and sub-band, using only the signals from the selected antennas. Finally, the method creates a clean output signal by subtracting interference signals from the received signals.

Claim 2

Original Legal Text

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein: the method further comprises estimating channels for the selected user equipment based on each of the plurality of antennas and each of the plurality of selected sub-bands; and the one or more criteria comprise the estimated channels for each of the plurality of antennas and for each of the plurality of selected sub-bands.

Plain English Translation

The method described above refines its antenna selection by first estimating the communication channels between each antenna and the user device for each sub-band. These channel estimates are then used as criteria for selecting the antennas. Specifically, the channel estimates, representing the signal quality or strength, are considered when deciding which antennas to use for signal detection and interference suppression for a particular user and sub-band. The better the estimated channel for a given antenna and sub-band, the more likely that antenna will be selected.

Claim 3

Original Legal Text

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein: the one or more criteria comprise signal strength, determined using the estimated channels, for each of the antennas and each of the plurality of selected sub-bands.

Plain English Translation

Building on the channel estimation method described, this enhancement specifies that the antenna selection criteria include signal strength. The signal strength is determined from the channel estimates calculated for each antenna and sub-band. The method favors antennas with stronger signal strengths (higher channel estimate values) for a given user and sub-band, as these antennas are likely to provide better signal quality and less interference, thereby improving the overall signal detection and interference suppression performance.

Claim 4

Original Legal Text

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein: the one or more criteria comprise one or both of estimated interference or orthogonality between user equipments including the selected user equipment detected in a coordinated multipoint area comprising the plurality of antennas, the one or both of estimated interference or orthogonality determined using the estimated channels and for each of the plurality of antennas and each of the plurality of selected sub-bands.

Plain English Translation

In addition to channel estimation, antenna selection criteria include estimated interference levels or the degree of orthogonality (independence) between signals from different users within a CoMP area. These factors are also determined using channel estimates for each antenna and sub-band. The method attempts to select antennas that minimize interference from other users or that provide the most orthogonal signals, enhancing the ability to separate and decode the intended user's signal accurately.

Claim 5

Original Legal Text

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein performing the signal detection and interference suppression further comprises: calculating interference for each of the plurality of selected sub-bands; and spatially suppressing the interference based on antenna weights calculated from the calculated interference and corresponding to the selected one or more antennas for each of the plurality of selected sub-bands.

Plain English Translation

In the method, the signal detection and interference suppression stage involves calculating the interference present in each sub-band. Based on this calculated interference and the selected antennas for that sub-band, antenna weights are calculated. The calculated antenna weights are applied to spatially suppress the interference, enhancing the desired signal. This means the method actively attempts to nullify or reduce the impact of interference signals by adjusting the contribution of each selected antenna.

Claim 6

Original Legal Text

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein: selecting selects m antennas per sub-band based on the one or more criteria, wherein m is less than all of the plurality of antennas; calculating interference further comprises selecting n interferers per selected sub-band, and calculating sub-band-wise interference based on channel estimates corresponding to the m antennas and based on the n strongest interferers; and spatially suppressing interference further comprises, using the calculated sub-band-wise interference, calculating and applying antenna-wise weights to the received signals.

Plain English Translation

To further refine the antenna selection and interference suppression, this method selects a limited number 'm' of antennas per sub-band (where 'm' is less than the total number of available antennas). The method then calculates interference by selecting 'n' of the strongest interfering signals for each sub-band. This sub-band-wise interference calculation relies on channel estimates from the 'm' selected antennas and the 'n' strongest interferers. Finally, antenna-wise weights are calculated and applied to the received signals based on the sub-band-wise interference to spatially suppress interference.

Claim 7

Original Legal Text

7. The method of claim 2 , wherein: selecting selects m antennas per sub-band based on the one or more criteria, wherein m is less than all of the plurality of antennas; performing the signal detection and interference suppression further comprises: calculating interference comprises selecting n interferers per selected sub-band, and further comprises determining an interference signal based on channel estimates corresponding to the m antennas and based on the 1 strongest interferers; and subtracting the interference signal from the plurality of received signals to create the output signal.

Plain English Translation

This method selects 'm' antennas per sub-band (where 'm' is less than the total number of antennas). The method then calculates interference by selecting 'n' of the strongest interfering signals per sub-band and determines an overall interference signal. The interference signal determination is based on channel estimates from the 'm' selected antennas and the 1 strongest interferer. Finally, this calculated interference signal is directly subtracted from the received signals, generating the output signal with reduced interference.

Claim 8

Original Legal Text

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein: each of the plurality of antennas is attached to an individual one of a plurality of reception nodes, and each of the plurality of reception nodes comprises one or more of the plurality of antennas; and at least one of the plurality of reception nodes comprises a remote radio head.

Plain English Translation

The antennas are connected to individual reception nodes, where each reception node can have one or more antennas. At least one of the reception nodes is a remote radio head (RRH). The RRH is a distributed antenna system component, placed remotely from the base station to provide better signal coverage and capacity in areas with poor signal strength or high user density.

Claim 9

Original Legal Text

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of selected sub-bands can span one or more physical resource blocks.

Plain English Translation

The sub-bands used in the method can span one or more physical resource blocks (PRBs). PRBs are the smallest unit of resource allocation in LTE and other cellular communication systems. This flexibility in sub-band size allows the method to adapt to varying channel conditions and traffic demands, optimizing resource utilization and signal quality.

Claim 10

Original Legal Text

10. An apparatus comprising: one or more processors; and one or more memories including computer program code, the one or more memories and the computer program code configured to, with the one or more processors, cause the apparatus to perform at least the following: receiving signals from a plurality of antennas, the signals being from a plurality of user equipments and comprising a plurality of sub-bands allocated to the plurality of user equipments; selecting, based on one or more criteria and for each of the plurality of selected sub-bands allocated to a selected one of the plurality of user equipments, one or more antennas of the plurality of antennas to be used for signal detection and interference suppression on the received signals for the selected user equipment; and performing, for the selected user equipment, the signal detection and interference suppression on the received signals for each of the plurality of selected sub-bands based on the corresponding selected one or more antennas for each of the plurality of selected sub-bands to create an output signal by subtracting an interference signal from the received signals.

Plain English Translation

An apparatus (device) implements a method to enhance signal reception in cellular networks, specifically for CoMP. It comprises one or more processors and memory storing program code. The code instructs the apparatus to: receive signals from multiple antennas, where these signals originate from multiple user devices, divided into sub-bands; select a subset of antennas for each user/sub-band based on criteria; perform signal detection/interference suppression on the received signals for that user/sub-band, using only the selected antennas; and create a clean output signal by subtracting interference signals.

Claim 11

Original Legal Text

11. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein: the one or more memories and the computer program code are further configured to, with the one or more processors, cause the apparatus to perform at least the following: estimating channels for the selected user equipment based on each of the plurality of antennas and each of the plurality of selected sub-bands; and the one or more criteria comprise the estimated channels for each of the plurality of antennas and for each of the plurality of selected sub-bands.

Plain English Translation

The apparatus described further refines its antenna selection by first estimating the communication channels between each antenna and the user device for each sub-band. These channel estimates are then used as criteria for selecting the antennas. Specifically, the code further instructs the apparatus to estimate the channels for each antenna and sub-band, and then use these estimated channels in selecting antennas for signal detection and interference suppression.

Claim 12

Original Legal Text

12. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein: the one or more criteria comprise signal strength, determined using the estimated channels, for each of the antennas and each of the plurality of selected sub-bands.

Plain English Translation

Building on the channel estimation described, this enhancement specifies that the antenna selection criteria include signal strength. The signal strength is determined from the channel estimates calculated for each antenna and sub-band. The better the estimated channel for a given antenna and sub-band, the more likely that antenna will be selected. The code instructs the apparatus to use signal strength derived from estimated channels in the antenna selection.

Claim 13

Original Legal Text

13. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein: the one or more criteria comprise one or both of estimated interference or orthogonality between user equipments including the selected user equipment detected in a coordinated multipoint area comprising the plurality of antennas, the one or both of estimated interference or orthogonality determined using the estimated channels and for each of the plurality of antennas and each of the plurality of selected sub-bands.

Plain English Translation

In addition to channel estimation, antenna selection criteria include estimated interference levels or the degree of orthogonality (independence) between signals from different users within a CoMP area. These factors are also determined using channel estimates for each antenna and sub-band. The apparatus attempts to select antennas that minimize interference from other users or that provide the most orthogonal signals. The code instructs the apparatus to use estimated interference or orthogonality between user equipment, derived from the estimated channels, as antenna selection criteria.

Claim 14

Original Legal Text

14. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein performing the signal detection and interference suppression further comprises: calculating interference for each of the plurality of selected sub-bands; and spatially suppressing the interference based on antenna weights calculated from the calculated interference and corresponding to the selected one or more antennas for each of the plurality of selected sub-bands.

Plain English Translation

The signal detection and interference suppression stage of the apparatus's method involves calculating the interference present in each sub-band. Based on this calculated interference and the selected antennas for that sub-band, antenna weights are calculated. The calculated antenna weights are applied to spatially suppress the interference, enhancing the desired signal. The code instructs the apparatus to calculate the interference for each selected sub-band and suppress the interference based on calculated antenna weights corresponding to selected antennas.

Claim 15

Original Legal Text

15. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein: selecting selects m antennas per sub-band based on the one or more criteria, wherein m is less than all of the plurality of antennas; calculating interference further comprises selecting n interferers per selected sub-band, and calculating sub-band-wise interference based on channel estimates corresponding to the m antennas and based on the n strongest interferers; and spatially suppressing interference further comprises, using the calculated sub-band-wise interference, calculating and applying antenna-wise weights to the received signals.

Plain English Translation

To further refine the antenna selection and interference suppression, the apparatus selects a limited number 'm' of antennas per sub-band (where 'm' is less than the total number of available antennas). The code instructs the apparatus to calculate interference by selecting 'n' of the strongest interfering signals for each sub-band. The sub-band-wise interference calculation relies on channel estimates from the 'm' selected antennas and the 'n' strongest interferers. Finally, antenna-wise weights are calculated and applied to the received signals based on the sub-band-wise interference.

Claim 16

Original Legal Text

16. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein: selecting selects m antennas per sub-band based on the one or more criteria, wherein m is less than all of the plurality of antennas; performing the signal detection and interference suppression further comprises: calculating interference comprises selecting n interferers per selected sub-band, and further comprises determining an interference signal based on channel estimates corresponding to the m antennas and based on the 1 strongest interferers; and subtracting the interference signal from the plurality of received signals to create the output signal.

Plain English Translation

The apparatus selects 'm' antennas per sub-band (where 'm' is less than the total number of antennas). The apparatus calculates interference by selecting 'n' of the strongest interfering signals per sub-band and determines an overall interference signal. The interference signal determination is based on channel estimates from the 'm' selected antennas and the 1 strongest interferer. Finally, this calculated interference signal is directly subtracted from the received signals, generating the output signal with reduced interference.

Claim 17

Original Legal Text

17. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein: each of the plurality of antennas is attached to an individual one of a plurality of reception nodes, and each of the plurality of reception nodes comprises one or more of the plurality of antennas; and at least one of the plurality of reception nodes comprises a remote radio head.

Plain English Translation

In the apparatus, the antennas are connected to individual reception nodes, where each reception node can have one or more antennas. At least one of the reception nodes is a remote radio head (RRH). The RRH is a distributed antenna system component, placed remotely from the base station to provide better signal coverage and capacity in areas with poor signal strength or high user density.

Claim 18

Original Legal Text

18. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the plurality of selected sub-bands can span one or more physical resource blocks.

Plain English Translation

The sub-bands used by the apparatus can span one or more physical resource blocks (PRBs). PRBs are the smallest unit of resource allocation in LTE and other cellular communication systems. This flexibility in sub-band size allows the apparatus to adapt to varying channel conditions and traffic demands, optimizing resource utilization and signal quality.

Claim 19

Original Legal Text

19. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein: the apparatus further comprises channel estimation circuitry and a receiver comprising baseband circuitry, the channel estimation circuitry separate from the receiver; the estimating channels is performed by the channel estimation circuitry and estimates of channels are supplied by the channel estimation circuitry to the baseband circuitry in the receiver; and selecting and performing are performed by the baseband circuitry.

Plain English Translation

The apparatus includes separate channel estimation circuitry and receiver circuitry (with baseband processing). The dedicated channel estimation circuitry provides channel estimates to the baseband processing section of the receiver. The baseband circuitry then uses those channel estimates to select antennas and perform signal detection and interference suppression. The channel estimation is thus offloaded to dedicated hardware separate from the main receiver chain.

Claim 20

Original Legal Text

20. A computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer-readable storage device bearing computer program code embodied therein for use with a computer, the computer program code comprising: code for receiving signals from a plurality of antennas, the signals being from a plurality of user equipments and comprising a plurality of sub-bands allocated to the plurality of user equipments; code for selecting, based on one or more criteria and for each of the plurality of selected sub-bands allocated to a selected one of the plurality of user equipments, one or more antennas of the plurality of antennas to be used for signal detection and interference suppression on the received signals for the selected user equipment; and code for performing, for the selected user equipment, the signal detection and interference suppression on the received signals for each of the plurality of selected sub-bands based on the corresponding selected one or more antennas for each of the plurality of selected sub-bands to create an output signal by subtracting an interference signal from the received signals.

Plain English Translation

A computer program product stored on a non-transitory storage device contains code for enhancing signal reception in cellular networks, specifically for CoMP. The code, when executed, performs the following: receives signals from multiple antennas, where these signals originate from multiple user devices and are divided into sub-bands allocated to each user; selects a subset of antennas for each user/sub-band based on criteria; performs signal detection/interference suppression on the received signals for that user/sub-band, using only the selected antennas; and creates a clean output signal by subtracting interference signals.

Patent Metadata

Filing Date

Unknown

Publication Date

October 28, 2014

Inventors

Kari P. Pajukoski
Kari J. Hooli
Esa T. Tiirola
Matti T. Kiiski
Pasi Eino Tapio Kinnunen

Want to explore more patents?

Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.

Citation & reuse

Analysis on this page is generated by Patentable — an AI-powered patent intelligence platform. AI-generated summaries, explanations, FAQs, and analysis may be reused with attribution and a visible link back to the canonical URL below. Patent abstracts and claims are USPTO public domain.

Cite as: Patentable. “Reduced Complexity Receiver For UL CoMP” (8873462). https://patentable.app/patents/8873462

© 2026 Nomic Interactive Technology LLC. Machine-readable context available at /api/llm-context/8873462. See llms.txt for full attribution policy.