A system and method for providing dynamic transaction optimizations, such as dynamic XA transaction optimizations. In accordance with an embodiment, the system enables monitoring of transactional behavior in an application during runtime, in order to provide a feedback loop. The application/transaction information in the feedback loop can be analyzed by a transaction manager to determine an indication as to whether a particular optimization, such as an isSameRM optimization, will provide a benefit or not. The optimization can then be applied accordingly. In accordance with various embodiments, such determination can be made transparently, so that its enablement is not detectable to, e.g., an end-application, or a system administrator, even though the distribution and type of XA calls may be detected through system monitoring. The feature can be used to improve the performance of transaction processing in a transaction-based system.
Legal claims defining the scope of protection. Each claim is shown in both the original legal language and a plain English translation.
1. A system for providing dynamic transaction optimizations in a distributed transaction process, comprising: a computing device which includes a processor and a transaction processing system for processing transaction requests received from one or more client applications, the transaction processing system comprising: one or more resource managers which control access to one or more resources; one or more transaction managers which receive the transaction requests from the client applications and provide connections to the resource managers to enable the resources to be updated; and one or more dynamic optimizations which can be dynamically enabled or disabled by the transaction managers at runtime in response to application/transaction feedback information from the resource managers; wherein the resource managers continuously provide the application/transaction feedback information to the transaction managers to determine whether a particular dynamic optimization will provide a benefit or not, and in which circumstances; and wherein the transaction manager explicitly enable or disable the particular dynamic optimization based on the determination.
A system optimizes distributed transactions using a computing device with a processor and a transaction processing system. The transaction processing system has resource managers controlling access to resources, and transaction managers that receive transaction requests from client applications and connect to the resource managers. The transaction managers dynamically enable or disable optimizations at runtime based on feedback from the resource managers. The resource managers continuously provide feedback to the transaction managers to determine if a specific optimization will be beneficial. The transaction manager then explicitly enables or disables the optimization based on this determination, enhancing transaction processing performance.
2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the transaction manager is an XA transaction manager, and the one or more resource managers are XA resource managers.
The dynamic transaction optimization system features an XA transaction manager and XA resource managers. The XA transaction manager, a component of the transaction processing system, manages distributed transactions adhering to the XA standard, while the XA resource managers control access to resources also compliant with the XA standard. The transaction manager dynamically enables or disables optimizations at runtime based on feedback from the resource managers, improving transaction processing performance. The resource managers continuously provide feedback to the transaction managers to determine if a specific optimization will be beneficial, and the XA transaction manager then enables or disables the optimization.
3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the dynamic optimization includes an isSameRM optimization, and wherein the application/transaction feedback information is used by the transaction manager to explicitly enable or disable the availability of the isSameRM optimization for application requests.
The system uses an "isSameRM" optimization, a dynamic optimization, that is enabled or disabled based on feedback. The transaction manager is an XA transaction manager, and the resource managers are XA resource managers. Application/transaction feedback is used by the XA transaction manager to explicitly control the availability of the isSameRM optimization for application requests. The isSameRM optimization is enabled only when the transaction manager determines it will provide a benefit, thus improving the efficiency of XA transaction processing.
4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the application/transaction feedback information is stored only in transient memory for use by the transaction manager for the duration of its uptime.
In the dynamic transaction optimization system, application/transaction feedback information, used for enabling/disabling optimizations, is stored only in transient memory for the transaction manager's uptime. This means the feedback data is not persisted across system restarts. The transaction manager leverages this temporary data to dynamically adjust optimizations in real-time. When the system shuts down or restarts, the collected feedback data is lost, requiring the transaction manager to rebuild its optimization strategy upon the next startup, using new feedback from the resource managers.
5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the application/transaction feedback information is persisted for use by the transaction manager after a reboot.
Application/transaction feedback information, used for dynamic transaction optimization, is persisted for use by the transaction manager after a reboot. This allows the transaction manager to retain learned optimization strategies even after the system restarts. Upon startup, the transaction manager uses this persisted data to initialize its optimization settings, potentially leading to faster and more efficient transaction processing from the beginning. The continuous feedback loop from the resource managers can further refine these persisted optimization strategies over time.
6. The system of claim 1 , further comprising one or more transaction processing monitors which coordinate the transaction requests between the client applications and the resources.
The system includes transaction processing monitors that coordinate transaction requests between client applications and the resources managed by resource managers. These monitors facilitate communication and manage the flow of transaction requests, ensuring proper execution and resource allocation. The system uses the transaction processing monitors along with the transaction managers to enable the dynamic enabling/disabling of optimizations. The resource managers continuously provide feedback to the transaction managers to determine if a specific optimization will be beneficial.
7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the transaction processing monitors include the transaction managers.
The transaction processing monitors are included within the transaction managers themselves. This indicates a close integration between the monitoring and management functions within the system. The transaction managers receive transaction requests, provide connections to the resource managers and also coordinate transaction requests. Dynamic optimizations are enabled or disabled based on the application/transaction feedback. The resource managers continuously provide feedback to the transaction managers to determine if a specific optimization will be beneficial.
8. A method for providing dynamic transaction optimizations in a distributed transaction process, comprising the steps of: providing a computing device which includes a processor and a transaction processing system for processing transaction requests received from one or more client applications; providing one or more resource managers which control access to one or more resources; providing one or more transaction managers which receive the transaction requests from the client applications and provide connections to the resource managers to enable the resources to be updated; and providing one or more dynamic optimizations which can be dynamically enabled or disabled by the transaction managers at runtime in response to application/transaction feedback information from the resource managers; wherein the resource managers continuously provide the application/transaction feedback information to the transaction managers to determine whether a particular dynamic optimization will provide a benefit or not, and in which circumstances; and wherein the transaction manager explicitly enable or disable the particular dynamic optimization based on the determination.
A method optimizes distributed transactions, involving a computing device with a transaction processing system that processes client application requests. Resource managers control access to resources, and transaction managers receive requests and provide connections to these managers. The transaction managers dynamically enable or disable optimizations at runtime using feedback from the resource managers. The resource managers continuously provide feedback to the transaction managers to determine if a specific optimization will be beneficial. The transaction manager then explicitly enables or disables the optimization based on this determination, improving transaction processing performance.
9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the transaction manager is an XA transaction manager, and the one or more resource managers are XA resource managers.
This method of dynamic transaction optimization uses an XA transaction manager and XA resource managers. The XA transaction manager, a component of the transaction processing system, manages distributed transactions adhering to the XA standard. The XA resource managers control access to resources, also compliant with the XA standard. The transaction manager dynamically enables or disables optimizations at runtime based on feedback from the resource managers, improving transaction processing performance. The resource managers continuously provide feedback to the transaction managers to determine if a specific optimization will be beneficial.
10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the dynamic optimization includes an isSameRM optimization, and wherein the application/transaction feedback information is used by the transaction manager to explicitly enable or disable the availability of the isSameRM optimization for application requests.
This method utilizes an "isSameRM" optimization, a dynamic optimization, that is enabled or disabled based on feedback. The transaction manager is an XA transaction manager, and the resource managers are XA resource managers. Application/transaction feedback is used by the XA transaction manager to explicitly control the availability of the isSameRM optimization for application requests. The isSameRM optimization is enabled only when the transaction manager determines it will provide a benefit, thus improving the efficiency of XA transaction processing.
11. The method of claim 8 , wherein the application/transaction feedback information is stored only in transient memory for use by the transaction manager for the duration of its uptime.
In this transaction optimization method, application/transaction feedback information, used for enabling/disabling optimizations, is stored only in transient memory for the transaction manager's uptime. This means the feedback data is not persisted across system restarts. The transaction manager leverages this temporary data to dynamically adjust optimizations in real-time. When the system shuts down or restarts, the collected feedback data is lost, requiring the transaction manager to rebuild its optimization strategy upon the next startup, using new feedback from the resource managers.
12. The method of claim 8 , wherein the application/transaction feedback information is persisted for use by the transaction manager after a reboot.
This method persists application/transaction feedback information, used for dynamic transaction optimization, for use by the transaction manager after a reboot. This allows the transaction manager to retain learned optimization strategies even after the system restarts. Upon startup, the transaction manager uses this persisted data to initialize its optimization settings, potentially leading to faster and more efficient transaction processing from the beginning. The continuous feedback loop from the resource managers can further refine these persisted optimization strategies over time.
13. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium, including instructions stored thereon, which when read and executed by one or more computers, cause the one or more computers to perform the steps comprising: providing a computing device which includes a processor and a transaction processing system for processing transaction requests received from one or more client applications; providing one or more resource managers which control access to one or more resources; providing one or more transaction managers which receive the transaction requests from the client applications and provide connections to the resource managers to enable the resources to be updated; and providing one or more dynamic optimizations which can be dynamically enabled or disabled by the transaction managers at runtime in response to application/transaction feedback information from the resource managers; wherein the resource managers continuously provide the application/transaction feedback information to the transaction managers to determine whether a particular dynamic optimization will provide a benefit or not, and in which circumstances; and wherein the transaction manager explicitly enable or disable the particular dynamic optimization based on the determination.
A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium stores instructions that, when executed, perform a method for optimizing distributed transactions. The method involves a computing device with a transaction processing system that processes client application requests. Resource managers control access to resources, and transaction managers receive requests and provide connections to the resource managers. The transaction managers dynamically enable or disable optimizations at runtime using feedback from the resource managers. The resource managers continuously provide feedback to the transaction managers to determine if a specific optimization will be beneficial. The transaction manager then explicitly enables or disables the optimization.
14. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein the transaction manager is an XA transaction manager, and the one or more resource managers are XA resource managers.
The non-transitory computer readable storage medium stores instructions to execute a method of dynamic transaction optimization using an XA transaction manager and XA resource managers. The XA transaction manager manages distributed transactions adhering to the XA standard. The XA resource managers control access to resources, also compliant with the XA standard. The transaction manager dynamically enables or disables optimizations at runtime based on feedback from the resource managers, improving transaction processing performance. The resource managers continuously provide feedback to the transaction managers to determine if a specific optimization will be beneficial.
15. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein the dynamic optimization includes an isSameRM optimization, and wherein the application/transaction feedback information is used by the transaction manager to explicitly enable or disable the availability of the isSameRM optimization for application requests.
The non-transitory computer readable storage medium stores instructions to execute a method that utilizes an "isSameRM" optimization, a dynamic optimization, that is enabled or disabled based on feedback. The transaction manager is an XA transaction manager, and the resource managers are XA resource managers. Application/transaction feedback is used by the XA transaction manager to explicitly control the availability of the isSameRM optimization for application requests. The isSameRM optimization is enabled only when the transaction manager determines it will provide a benefit, thus improving the efficiency of XA transaction processing.
16. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein the application/transaction feedback information is stored only in transient memory for use by the transaction manager for the duration of its uptime.
The non-transitory computer readable storage medium stores instructions such that application/transaction feedback information, used for enabling/disabling optimizations, is stored only in transient memory for the transaction manager's uptime. This means the feedback data is not persisted across system restarts. The transaction manager leverages this temporary data to dynamically adjust optimizations in real-time. When the system shuts down or restarts, the collected feedback data is lost, requiring the transaction manager to rebuild its optimization strategy upon the next startup, using new feedback from the resource managers.
17. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein the application/transaction feedback information is persisted for use by the transaction manager after a reboot.
The non-transitory computer readable storage medium stores instructions to persist application/transaction feedback information, used for dynamic transaction optimization, for use by the transaction manager after a reboot. This allows the transaction manager to retain learned optimization strategies even after the system restarts. Upon startup, the transaction manager uses this persisted data to initialize its optimization settings, potentially leading to faster and more efficient transaction processing from the beginning. The continuous feedback loop from the resource managers can further refine these persisted optimization strategies over time.
Cooperative Patent Classification codes for this invention. Click any code to explore related patents in that topic.
July 21, 2011
September 17, 2013
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.