A drive-implemented method according to one embodiment includes determining an extent of tape dimensional instability, and adjusting a tilt angle of a first array of transducers based on the determined extent. A readback operation is performed using the array oriented at the tile angle. During the readback operation, a longitudinal axis of the first arrays is not parallel to the longitudinal axis of a second array of transducers coupled thereto.
Legal claims defining the scope of protection. Each claim is shown in both the original legal language and a plain English translation.
1. A drive-implemented method, comprising: determining an extent of tape dimensional instability; adjusting a tilt angle of a first array of transducers relative to a tape passing thereover based on the determined extent; and performing a readback operation at the tilt angle, wherein, during the readback operation, a longitudinal axis of the first array is not parallel to a longitudinal axis of a second array of transducers coupled thereto, wherein orientations of the longitudinal axes of the arrays are fixed relative to each other, wherein a relative angle between the longitudinal axes is greater than 0.1 degree.
A tape drive system reads data from tape by first measuring the amount of stretching or shrinking (dimensional instability) of the tape. Based on this measurement, the system adjusts the angle (tilt) of a first array of read heads relative to the tape. Data is then read using this adjusted angle. Importantly, the first array of read heads is oriented at a non-parallel angle relative to a second array of read heads in the drive. These two arrays have a fixed angular relationship greater than 0.1 degrees.
2. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein a pitch of the transducers of the first array is greater than a pitch of the transducers of the second array.
The tape drive system described previously reads data from tape using two arrays of read heads. The first array, which has its angle adjusted based on tape instability, has a larger spacing (pitch) between individual read heads than the second array. This difference in pitch is leveraged when reading tape.
3. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein an average width of the transducers of the first array is smaller than an average width of the transducers of the second array.
The tape drive system described previously reads data from tape using two arrays of read heads. The first array, which has its angle adjusted based on tape instability, has read heads that are, on average, narrower than the read heads in the second array. This difference in read head width affects signal processing.
4. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the transducers of the first array are dissimilar to the transducers in the second array.
The tape drive system described previously reads data from tape using two arrays of read heads. The first array, which has its angle adjusted based on tape instability, uses different types of read heads (dissimilar transducers) than the read heads used in the second array. The different reader types may have different read characteristics.
5. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein a third array of transducers is coupled to the first array, the third array having a longitudinal axis oriented parallel to the longitudinal axis of the second array.
The tape drive system described previously reads data from tape using two arrays of read heads. The first array has its angle adjusted based on tape instability. A third array of read heads is also present in the system, and this third array is aligned parallel to the second array. Thus, the angle between the first and second read head arrays is not zero, but the second and third read head arrays are parallel.
6. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the transducers of the first array include readers.
The tape drive system described previously reads data from tape using two arrays of read heads. The first array has its angle adjusted based on tape instability. The read heads in this first array are specifically designed for reading data (readers), not for writing data.
7. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein a third array of transducers is coupled to the first array, the third array having a longitudinal axis defined between outermost transducers thereof, wherein the longitudinal axes of the second and third arrays are not parallel to one another.
The tape drive system described previously reads data from tape using two arrays of read heads. The first array has its angle adjusted based on tape instability. A third array of read heads is also present, and the longitudinal axes of the second and third arrays are not parallel to one another. The longitudinal axis of the third array is defined between the outermost transducers of the third array.
8. A method, comprising: determining an extent of tape dimensional instability; adjusting a tilt angle of a first array of transducers relative to a tape passing thereover based on the determined extent; and performing a readback operation at the tilt angle, wherein, during the readback operation, a longitudinal axis of the first array is not parallel to a longitudinal axis of a second array of transducers coupled thereto, wherein an angle between the longitudinal axes of the arrays is adjustable to greater than 0.1 degree.
A tape drive system reads data from tape by first measuring the amount of stretching or shrinking (dimensional instability) of the tape. Based on this measurement, the system adjusts the angle (tilt) of a first array of read heads relative to the tape. Data is then read using this adjusted angle. Importantly, the first array of read heads is oriented at a non-parallel angle relative to a second array of read heads in the drive. The angle between these read head arrays is adjustable to greater than 0.1 degrees.
9. A drive-implemented method, comprising: determining an extent of tape dimensional instability; selecting a first of at least two arrays to use for a readback operation based at least in part on a pitch between transducers thereof and on the determined extent, wherein the pitch of the transducers of the first array is greater than the pitch of the transducers of a second of the arrays; adjusting a tilt angle of the first array of transducers to perform a readback operation based on the determined extent; and performing the readback operation.
A tape drive system reads data from tape by first measuring the amount of stretching or shrinking (dimensional instability) of the tape. Based on this measurement and the spacing (pitch) between read heads in different arrays, the system selects one of at least two arrays to use for reading. The array selected has a different pitch than the other array(s). The angle of the selected array is then adjusted, and data is read from the tape.
10. The method as recited in claim 9 , comprising adjusting an angle between longitudinal axes of the first array relative to the second array.
The tape drive system described previously selects an array of read heads based on tape instability and the pitch of the read heads. The system also adjusts the angle between the longitudinal axes of the selected read head array (first array) relative to the second read head array.
11. The method as recited in claim 9 , wherein orientations of longitudinal axes of the arrays are fixed relative to each other.
The tape drive system described previously selects an array of read heads based on tape instability and the pitch of the read heads. The longitudinal axes of the different read head arrays are fixed relative to each other, and do not dynamically change.
12. The method as recited in claim 9 , wherein an average width of the transducers of the first array is smaller than an average width of the transducers of the second array.
The tape drive system described previously selects an array of read heads based on tape instability and the pitch of the read heads. The selected array (first array) has read heads that are, on average, narrower than the read heads in the other array (second array).
13. The method as recited in claim 9 , wherein a relative angle between longitudinal axes of at least two of the arrays is greater than 0.1 degree.
The tape drive system described previously selects an array of read heads based on tape instability and the pitch of the read heads. The angle between the longitudinal axes of at least two of the read head arrays is greater than 0.1 degrees.
14. The method as recited in claim 9 , wherein the transducers of the first array are dissimilar to the transducers in the second array.
The tape drive system described previously selects an array of read heads based on tape instability and the pitch of the read heads. The selected read head array (first array) uses different types of read heads (dissimilar transducers) compared to the read heads in the second array.
15. The method as recited in claim 9 , wherein a third array of transducers is coupled to the first array, the third array having a longitudinal axis oriented parallel to the longitudinal axis of the second array.
The tape drive system described previously selects an array of read heads based on tape instability and the pitch of the read heads. A third array of read heads is also present, and this third array is aligned parallel to the second read head array.
16. The method as recited in claim 9 , wherein the transducers of the first array include readers.
The tape drive system described previously selects an array of read heads based on tape instability and the pitch of the read heads. The read heads in the selected array (first array) are specifically designed for reading data (readers), not for writing data.
17. The method as recited in claim 9 , wherein a third array of transducers is coupled to the first array, the third array having a longitudinal axis defined between outermost transducers thereof, wherein the longitudinal axes of the second and third arrays are not parallel to one another.
The tape drive system described previously selects an array of read heads based on tape instability and the pitch of the read heads. A third array of read heads is also present, and the longitudinal axes of the second and third arrays are not parallel to one another. The longitudinal axis of the third array is defined between the outermost transducers of the third array.
Cooperative Patent Classification codes for this invention. Click any code to explore related patents in that topic.
May 6, 2016
July 25, 2017
Browse 5M+ US patents with plain-English claim translations and AI-generated analysis.